Hatchback (SX 2.0 typically refers to the 3-door hatchback variant of the Dodge Neon platform)
🛡️ Safety Features
Ratings
NHTSA Frontal Impact Driver:
Likely 4-star (based on 2000 Dodge Neon ratings, SX 2.0 is a variant)
NHTSA Frontal Impact Passenger:
Likely 4-star (based on 2000 Dodge Neon ratings)
Active Features
ABS:
Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) available or standard depending on trim
Passive Features
Airbags:
Driver and Passenger Front Airbags (standard), Side Airbags (optional/available)
Seat Belts:
3-Point Seat Belts with Pretensioners
💡 Technology Features
Infotainment
Audio System:
Standard AM/FM stereo with CD player or Cassette tape player, optional premium audio systems.
Driver Assistance
Cruise Control:
Available on certain trim levels.
🔧 Maintenance
Service Intervals
Oil Change Interval:
Typically 3,000 - 7,500 miles or 6-12 months, depending on oil type and driving conditions (consult manual for specifics).
Coolant Flush Interval:
Recommended every 30,000 - 60,000 miles or 2-4 years.
Fluid Specifications
Engine Oil Type:
SAE 5W-30 Synthetic or Conventional (refer to owner's manual for exact specification and capacity).
Transmission Fluid Type Auto:
ATF+4 (for automatic transmissions, check manual for specific part number).
Brake Fluid Type:
DOT 3 or DOT 4 (consult manual for exact specification).
Known Issues
Common Problems:
Oil leaks from valve cover gasket and oil pan, alternator failure, cooling system leaks (hose, radiator), power steering pump issues, interior trim wear, rear axle bushings wear.
📚 Vehicle History
Brand Heritage
Brand Origin:
Dodge is an American automotive brand founded in 1914.
Model Evolution
Platform Basis:
The Dodge SX 2.0 is a variant of the second-generation Dodge Neon (2000-2005), which was part of Chrysler's P-platform.
Production
Manufacturing Location:
Primarily Sterling Heights, Michigan, USA and Belvidere, Illinois, USA (for the Neon platform).
🏆 Awards & Recognition
Recognitions
Critical Reviews:
The second-generation Neon platform (which the SX 2.0 is based on) received mixed reviews. While offering competitive pricing and a decent ride for its class, it was often criticized for interior material quality and some reliability concerns compared to Japanese competitors.
Le choix d'une sélection entraîne l'actualisation de la page entière.