Hatchback (SX 2.0 typically refers to the 3-door hatchback variant of the Dodge Neon platform)
🛡️ Safety Features
Ratings
NHTSA Frontal Impact Driver:
Likely 4-star (based on 2000 Dodge Neon ratings, SX 2.0 is a variant)
NHTSA Frontal Impact Passenger:
Likely 4-star (based on 2000 Dodge Neon ratings)
Active Features
ABS:
Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) available or standard depending on trim
Passive Features
Airbags:
Driver and Passenger Front Airbags (standard), Side Airbags (optional/available)
Seat Belts:
3-Point Seat Belts with Pretensioners
💡 Technology Features
Infotainment
Audio System:
Standard AM/FM stereo with CD player or Cassette tape player, optional premium audio systems.
Driver Assistance
Cruise Control:
Available on certain trim levels.
🔧 Maintenance
Service Intervals
Oil Change Interval:
Typically 3,000 - 7,500 miles or 6-12 months, depending on oil type and driving conditions (consult manual for specifics).
Coolant Flush Interval:
Recommended every 30,000 - 60,000 miles or 2-4 years.
Fluid Specifications
Engine Oil Type:
SAE 5W-30 Synthetic or Conventional (refer to owner's manual for exact specification and capacity).
Transmission Fluid Type Auto:
ATF+4 (for automatic transmissions, check manual for specific part number).
Brake Fluid Type:
DOT 3 or DOT 4 (consult manual for exact specification).
Known Issues
Common Problems:
Oil leaks from valve cover gasket and oil pan, alternator failure, cooling system leaks (hose, radiator), power steering pump issues, interior trim wear, rear axle bushings wear.
📚 Vehicle History
Brand Heritage
Brand Origin:
Dodge is an American automotive brand founded in 1914.
Model Evolution
Platform Basis:
The Dodge SX 2.0 is a variant of the second-generation Dodge Neon (2000-2005), which was part of Chrysler's P-platform.
Production
Manufacturing Location:
Primarily Sterling Heights, Michigan, USA and Belvidere, Illinois, USA (for the Neon platform).
🏆 Awards & Recognition
Recognitions
Critical Reviews:
The second-generation Neon platform (which the SX 2.0 is based on) received mixed reviews. While offering competitive pricing and a decent ride for its class, it was often criticized for interior material quality and some reliability concerns compared to Japanese competitors.